Trust me... I get it
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Jeffrey Pyne - Murderer?
Interesting story about the “perfect son” turned murdered. Or so the headlines like us to believe.
Now, when I first started watching the show, I was leaning towards dad as the murdered.
That was until I saw Jeffrey’s hands. I have had skin torn off, and my hands bled and then scabbed over.
Blisters on the other hand do not bleed and that is what Jeff clearly had on his hands.
Now where I do differ of opinion in this case.
There are those that think he is innocent. I don’t agree.
There are those that think he was guilty and many that think he deserves to be in jail. I don’t agree.
I think he is guilty but I don’t think he deserves jail.
This was a kid who lived in fear.
His mother was bi-polar and when she was not on her medication, she was dangerous.
She did try to kill him remember.
This was not a mother who just screamed and acted irrational.
She tried to kill him.
This changes everything to me.
When a child who lived in fear murders the parent(s) that cause that fear, it to me is not just murder.
It’s self-defense, revenge, fear. It is very different to me.
Yes, kids are abused every day and very few grow up to murder their parents. But at the end of the day to me, this is still a game changer.
This is not a crazed person murdering for joy. This is not someone that is a danger to society.
They need help. They need counseling.
Prison is just not the right place for them.
They deserve pity. Yes, this was wrong, but it is still different.
No child should ever live in fear. Their home should be where they are safe.
As someone that had “safe”, I cannot imagine being in fear in my own home.
Now in this case, I have heard many people say “Jeff was an adult and could have just left”.
This is where I do not agree.
Yes, Jeff was free to leave. BUT, he had a young sister who remained at that home.
A younger sister who could be in danger.
Now ask yourself this, if you had a younger sibling, and you knew your mom was potentially dangerous, could you just walk away? Could you leave her alone?
I could not do it.
I don’t think Jeff could either. Yes, just my theory, but I do think it makes the most sense.
So now imagine wanting to leave, but in doing so, you are leaving your young helpless sister alone. Alone in a home with a mother that could stop taking her meds, a mother that tried to kill you, a mother that had started storing knives in her room.
Could you really just leave?
So here is where I find motive.
I think at that point, it was not about him. It was about his sister. Even if he stayed in the home, he was not there 24/7. His sister is not safe. At any point in time, mom could snap.
SHE WAS NOT SAFE. PERIOD
I think Jeff either planned this out to ensure his sister was safe and he could live his life. Or his mother said something threatening and Jeff had enough.
I don’t blame him at all.
I do however blame dad.
Those children should not have had to live in a home with that mother.
Dad should have protected those kids and removed them the day she tried to kill Jeff.
There is NO excuse.
I am a parent. I have a son and I am married.
I do not care why…. if my husband tried to hurt my son, I would leave.
I would protect my son.
I would not remain in a home where my child was not safe.
Dad is to blame for that.
At the end of the day think Jeff was the one that took action to protect his sister.
The only thing I am not sure of is if he planned this or he felt there was a treat at that moment and acted.
Either way, I do think the laws need to change.
When a child is raised in a home where the parent(s) is abusive, there is severe damage done.
When that child grows up and murders that parent(s), the defense is different.
I don’t think they deserve a slap on the hand and sent home. But I do not think prison is the answer. I think a mental facility and years of counseling is.
I also think there needs to be better control on who is having kids.
Kids need to be protected. We need better programs, better training.
But until we reach that point, these kids need help. They are not given a choice. They are helpless. A parent should protect their child with their own life. A child should not be in fear of their parent.
There is no excuse.
Stop the abuse or be prepared to better handle the consequences.
Thursday, October 2, 2014
Jeffrey MacDonald revisited
Thursday, September 25, 2014
ANOTHER Madeleine McCann book?
But…. I just do not understand why people STILL support them. But that was until I read an article about the book, or more the response the authors had to the criticism on their book.
One such response was this:
“We had a single meeting with the McCann’s and one with the Met – both of them early in our research. The parents, and then the police, made only one request of us – a fair one given the parents’ hope and the Met’s working thesis that Madeleine may still be alive – that we do nothing that might hinder or interfere with the ongoing investigation. We have been careful to abide by that request.”
What do you see here? “…the Mets working thesis that Madeline may still be alive”. So the Met clearly made them aware without directly stating it that they expect the book to support their “theory”. That Madeline is still alive. Which totally contradicts the cadaver evidence.
WHITE WASH!
Now, I think it’s safe to say, this couple have had support like no other missing case ever. Political support. Support from the media. I can go on. But at the end of the day, you have to ask why.
We may never know. I think the most logical conclusion is that they just have “friends in high places”.
Not even considering the fact that the Met has spent millions of their tax payers money to review a case and not follow a single “FACT”, but rather dredge up old leads….already cleared by the Portuguese police…. and call them “new”. All of course while the libel trial is going on.
Like many people think, I too believe there is a connection no doubt. They want to be in the news so that the world is looking at them supporting the “abduction theory” vs mom and dad’s involvement.
What kills me is that the Met has NO legal authority on this case and the fact that they decided to do this during the libel trial and well, are not following the facts and refuse to even consider looking at mom and dad.
How can you call this an investigation yet ignore the facts. And let’s be honest, statistically mom and dad are involved in these cases. Their refusal to see that is clear. They are covering for mom and dad. Period.
To me the cadaver dogs are the most critical piece of evidence.
Yes…. Gerry TRIED to discredit the dogs. I find this interesting initially because of the fact that instead of being concerned for his daughter… he sought to discredit evidence. I think that for those that see past the BS see that for what it is. You are trying to get people to focus away from evidence in the case. Evidence that leads to only you and Kate. Why do I say that…. Well fact….. It takes about 1.5 hours for a dead body to emit cadaver odor. So, with their 15-30 min checks…. That makes this impossible. There was no time for an abductor to have killed Madeline. AND better yet, 6 months after Gerry used the case of Eugene Zapata to help discredit dogs, simply because they didn’t find a body, Mr. Zapata then confessed that he murdered his wife. So those cadaver dogs… THEY WERE RIGHT. Not often do people confess, but this should have helped the case against Gerry and Kate... But, well, their political support still trumps hard facts.
So the only way Gerry and Kate were not responsible in some manner for Madeleine’s death…. The only other options is that the “abductor” killed her in the apartment. Waited there 1.5 hours….was undetected during all these “checks” then put her body behind the couch, then moved her to the closest. Then left with her dead body.
Ok sure.
Now, I like to be fair and consider the options…..
So let’s look at them all.
So option 1 to recap…..The abductor killed her in the apartment. Waited there for about 1.5 hours…..was able to stay undetected during all the “checks”….. then hid her body in 2 locations and then later left with her dead body.
So….option 2. The dogs were wrong. I don’t have much more to add here. So for them to be wrong, the one of the most experienced cadaver dogs… was just wrong. Option 2.
Moving on….
Option 3. The hotel AND the rental car company LIED that there was a death in the room AND the vehicle. Not sure why they would lie but again, if you think they are innocent, this must be at least considered as an option.
Option 4. There was a murder in both the hotel room AND the rental car and it was not reported to the hotel or the rental car company. A person does not simply pass away in a small closet or behind a couth and get moved AND the trunk of a car AND not get reported.
Or last but not least, option 5. They were framed. LONG shot but like I said, I look at the options.
So what do you think.
I would love to hear what you think the cadaver dog scent really means.
Option 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5?
To discredit it, it has to be one of those options.
Thursday, June 26, 2014
Gerry McCann is Smithman
Was the Smith sighting really Gerry Mccann?
I think it was.
First of all, the timeline for this sighting vs when the alarm was sounded is at the exact same time. Now, that would mean that either Madeline was kidnapped at 9:15 and this person carried her around for over 45 minutes being seen by both Jane and the Smiths…. Or that possibly, just possibly, the time of the alarm at 10pm was done on purpose as a cover while Gerry disposed of Madeleine. Do we have anyone outside the Tapas group that can 100% tell us Gerry Mccann was at the table at that time.
Then, the parents have a page on their find Madeleine website with potential suspects. The Tanner sighting is included and they also have a random e-fit of a male that was “acting suspicious” near the resort and an e-fit of some random woman “acting suspicious” in Spain. SPAIN? Really??? But the Smith sighting is given no consideration on their site. Interesting…..
Then, Kate herself states both the Tanner and Smith sighting are equally important and are likely the same person. She states this in the documentary “Madeline was here”. Part 2/5 on youtube.
Well, I struggle with this…...
IF THEY ARE THE SAME…again, why don’t the Mccann’s include the Smith sighting e-fits on their website along with the Jane turner sighting? Jane’s description is the man from a distance, the Smith sighting is of the face. I think IF they really think this is the same, why not share those e-fits?
IF THEY ARE THE SAME …..then that means that this man walking around with a child uncovered covered at 9:15going one direction was then STILL out walking about at 10:00pm going a totally opposite direction. So that means this man was carrying this “abducted child” around for 45 minutes. REALLY?
Mr Smith saw Gerry carrying another child and at that time said the way he was carrying the child reminded him of the man he saw that night. Now, I have seen many state that if he was so concerned, why did he wait so long to come forward. Well, lets be honest. You see a man carrying what appears to be a sleeping child down the street….. does that ring any alarm bells in your mind. Even if you hear about a child kidnapping. Its not like he was running, or the child was fighting. If you assume she was asleep, a kidnapper is not going to get out with a 4 year old child without waking her up. Then he has since disappeared. Well, if you consider the fact that the Mccanns have sued people over their theories that they were involved, do you not think there was some threat possibly made to this man who was claiming he was sure that the sighting was Gerry. I think it’s entirely possible.
Also, consider for a moment... That Gerry being aware that this family saw him and could identify him later....has Jane claim to see this similar man carrying a child at the same exact time she sees Gerry speaking to Jez. This would work to clear Gerry, Jane saw the man at the same time she saw Gerry, that takes him out of the equation IF you believe Jane. Now many state there is no reason for the friends to lie to help the McCann's.... But maybe there is... I think the Mccann's drugged the kids to sleep, I think it's also likely the other parents did this at least once during this vacation. Now..if you have everyone drugging their kids and one dies accidentally due to this....it really drags everyone in. You are all just as guilty. If one goes down, you all do. I think they all realized that it could have been their child, and they are all in this coverup or they all stand to go to jail. I mean if they tell the police what happened, Gerry and Kate tell the police all of them drugged the kids and now they all go down. Since drugging your kids so the sleep is illegal.
Either way,,,.Gerry and Kate above all… as I have talked about in prior posts were negligent. PERIOD.
You do not leave toddlers alone ever.
These are selfish people.
If you wanted a quiet adult only vacation, you leave the kids with family or babysitter. They had the means. They just choose instead to risk their safety.
Monday, April 14, 2014
Oscar Pistorius continued
Being a lover of “Statement Analysis” I have realized how often normally these lies and inconsistencies occur and no one ever catches on. Kinda like Hannah Anderson stating on national TV that she was threatened not to try to get help by her captor… then moments later says he was “signally for help”. Such a huge WTF moment yet no one ever stopped to ask what she meant by such a glaring contradiction to her entire story line.
So now back to Oscar.
So, now what about the neighbors. They clearly stated they heard a man and a woman fighting. Then blood curdling screams before the shots were fired and after first shot.
I think he did in fact kill her after an argument.