ANOTHER Madeleine McCann book?

Yep, it's true..

So we have yet ANOTHER book about the case of missing Madeline McCann?

No worries about a lawsuit this time though…..Gerry and Kate I am sure are pleased with this one. 

Unlike the books written by Goncalo Amaral and Pat Brown who wrote about the facts of the case and what those facts most likely meant, that Madeline died in that apartment, this book is yet another white wash.

Now, I did NOT read this book. I refuse to support anything that supports their innocence. 

I just flat out do not buy it. I have said in my prior posts, the evidence supports a death in their apartment. Nothing more. 

But…. I just do not understand why people STILL support them. But that was until I read an article about the book, or more the response the authors had to the criticism on their book.

One such response was this:

“We had a single meeting with the McCann’s and one with the Met – both of them early in our research. The parents, and then the police, made only one request of us – a fair one given the parents’ hope and the Met’s working thesis that Madeleine may still be alive –  that we do nothing that might hinder or interfere with the ongoing investigation. We have been careful to abide by that request.”

What do you see here? “…the Mets working thesis that Madeline may still be alive”. So the Met clearly made them aware without directly stating it that they expect the book to support their “theory”. That Madeline is still alive. Which totally contradicts the cadaver evidence. 

WHITE WASH! 

Now, I think it’s safe to say, this couple have had support like no other missing case ever. Political support. Support from the media. I can go on. But at the end of the day, you have to ask why. 

We may never know. I think the most logical conclusion is that they just have “friends in high places”. 

Not even considering the fact that the Met has spent millions of their tax payers money to review a case and not follow a single “FACT”, but rather dredge up old leads….already cleared by the Portuguese police…. and call them “new”. All of course while the libel trial is going on. 

Like many people think, I too believe there is a connection no doubt. They want to be in the news so that the world is looking at them supporting the “abduction theory” vs mom and dad’s involvement.

What kills me is that the Met has NO legal authority on this case and the fact that they decided to do this during the libel trial and well, are not following the facts and refuse to even consider looking at mom and dad. 

How can you call this an investigation yet ignore the facts. And let’s be honest, statistically mom and dad are involved in these cases. Their refusal to see that is clear. They are covering for mom and dad. Period.

To me the cadaver dogs are the most critical piece of evidence. 

Yes…. Gerry TRIED to discredit the dogs. I find this interesting initially because of the fact that instead of being concerned for his daughter… he sought to discredit evidence. I think that for those that see past the BS see that for what it is. You are trying to get people to focus away from evidence in the case. Evidence that leads to only you and Kate. Why do I say that…. Well fact….. It takes about 1.5 hours for a dead body to emit cadaver odor. So, with their 15-30 min checks…. That makes this impossible. There was no time for an abductor to have killed Madeline.  AND better yet, 6 months after Gerry used the case of Eugene Zapata to help discredit dogs, simply because they didn’t find a body, Mr. Zapata then confessed that he murdered his wife. So those cadaver dogs… THEY WERE RIGHT. Not often do people confess, but this should have helped the case against Gerry and Kate... But, well, their political support still trumps hard facts. 

So the only way Gerry and Kate were not responsible in some manner for Madeleine’s death…. The only other options is that the “abductor” killed her in the apartment. Waited there 1.5 hours….was undetected during all these “checks” then put her body behind the couch, then moved her to the closest. Then left with her dead body.

Ok sure.

Now, I like to be fair and consider the options…..

So let’s look at them all. 

So option 1 to recap…..The abductor killed her in the apartment. Waited there for about 1.5 hours…..was able to stay undetected during all the “checks”….. then hid her body in 2 locations and then later left with her dead body. 

So….option 2. The dogs were wrong. I don’t have much more to add here. So for them to be wrong, the one of the most experienced cadaver dogs… was just wrong. Option 2. 

Moving on…. 

Option 3. The hotel AND the rental car company LIED that there was a death in the room AND the vehicle. Not sure why they would lie but again, if you think they are innocent, this must be at least considered as an option. 

Option 4.  There was a murder in both the hotel room AND the rental car and it was not reported to the hotel or the rental car company. A person does not simply pass away in a small closet or behind a couth and get moved AND the trunk of a car AND not get reported. 

Or last but not least, option 5. They were framed. LONG shot but  like I said, I look at the options.

So what do you think.
I would love to hear what you think the cadaver dog scent really means.
Option 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5?

To discredit it, it has to be one of those options. 

Gerry and Kate Mccann need to be held accountable!

Why do people really still buy in to the bullshit?

Are people still that naïve, stupid?

Apparently they do. Look at all the supporters in the comments supporting them. 

Do some searching. Read other articles, blogs. There are even entire blogs that support them. Blogs that find a reason to excuse every lie, discrepancy, bad decision. Why?

I am so fed up with the lies and the blame being pushed on others.

The only true blame lies with mom and dad. Mom and dad left their babies ALONE.  Even if the child was simply abducted (which I think is a flat out lie) had they been there, I do not think it would have happened.

And for the LOVE OF PETE….There is a reason 2 and 3 year olds are not to be left alone. It is DANGEROUS.

FACT FACT FACT. DANGEROUS.

Nothing else is more important.

I am a mom. I know what my son could do at the age of 2. At the age of 3. I would never have left him alone. Even at the age of 6 I do NOT leave him alone. In fact, where I live it is ILLEGAL to leave a child under the age of 13 alone. And had the Mccanns done that here, they would have been arrested and charged with child endangerment. FACT again. Yet in this case, they are almost hero’s that suffered something that they had no part in.

Really? Leaving your children alone is your fault. No one else is to blame.

I  have a huge family. I babysat most of my teen years. I know what kids that age can and do AND get into. In minutes. So to put them alone for hours?

And we all know that at least 2 days prior to Madeline missing, they were not checking as they claimed. We all know that the woman upstairs heard a child crying for OVER AN HOUR. This is a fact! The parents even tried to minimize this by saying Madeleine asked them where they were. But hey  mom and dad, even if she quickly dropped it… its still an issues. Not only did she NOT sleep through the night, even with this, you continued to leave them alone.

So the simple fact here is that mom and dad left babies alone. ALONE.  

And we know that the kids did wake up. So why the hell did you continue to do so?

One reason. They were Selfish!

PERIOD.

There is no excuse.

The steps from the room to the Tapas bar was traced by several people…

It is a 1.5 minute walk. FACT FACT FACT. Can I say this again, that this is a fact.

This is not like being in your backyard (garden) as Gerry claims. I have sat in my back yard and yah know what, my kid has needed me and he was able to just come to the backyard and get me. Or if he cried, I can hear him. FACT.

A 1.5 minute walk is more like being in the backyard (garden) 6 houses down the road. You can not hear your child cry. You can not tend to them if there is an accident. It is dangerous.

So why why why do all of you stupid people still think they are innocent??????

Stop being stupid and wake the heck up!

This was not a bad decision. This was a life altering horrible selfish decision. Gerry and Kate are to blame and have not for one second ever even owned this blame. They excuse this behavior as totally acceptable. When it’s not!

They choose to hang out, eat and drink too far to hear the kids…..despite the dangers that are there for young children.

So right off the bat, at the least there should have been charges for that. Yet none were made.

We instead have the blame put on the police. They did nothing.

Well, anyone that wishes to make this claim needs to do some research. That is a lie. Nothing more. There was more done to find this child than just about any case in the world. Searches were immediate. They were done on land, in water and in the air. How often do you see missing kids searched for by boat and air? You don’t. But I guess in this case, it happening still makes people say they did nothing really to help. Sounds to me more like mom and dad trying desperately to put the focus on anyone but them and their own shit decisions.

Then if that was not enough… the lies and refusal to help this case continued.

Both stated that the shutters were broken, jimmied, open.  This is a fact. It was said by both.

Gerry even stated that he went out side and tested the shutters and they COULD be opened from outside.

Why would anyone need to flat out lie about those shutters? If your child was kidnapped and you are innocent. Why would you lie about those shutters?

But they both lied about them.

Because the fact here is that the shutters were not open. They were not broken. And they CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE.This was tested and proven to be a fact. THEY CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE with out being broken. They were not broken.

Also, mom and dad also stated themselves that the shutters had been closed the entire trip until this night. So if this is true, why then were moms fingerprints on the shutters? If they never opened them, Kates fingerprints would not be there. But they were. Again, I am talking about facts. 

Also, Gerry stated that when he got back to the room with Kate after she came running to tell him Madeleine was taken, that the shutters were OPEN. So, now we have mom leaving the twins ALONE AGAIN in the same room where the claim Madeline was “kidnapped” but she even left those shutters OPEN. REALLY?

So ask yourself why would anyone lie about this?  

There is only one logical reason. They needed to lie. They needed to support their kidnapping story.

Why? Well, if there was an accidental death, and like I believe. the children had been sedated they must lie. An autopsy would show the sedation.

·         They would be charged for her death  

·         They would lose their licenses to practice medicine

·         And would likely lose their other children.

Lots of motive here to lie. Yet still people ignore these facts in the case.

Why would the police need to lie?

And I watched one of their interviews where Gerry and Kate made the following comments. Those are pasted below directly from the transcripts.

 I am now going to answer each of the questions or points Gerry claims were basically nonsense. This is not some crazy theory. It’s not like police are claiming she was abducted by aliens. The theory police have matches the evidence.

Gerry: I mean the ludicrous thing is erm what, I suppose what’s been purported from Portugal is that Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body. Well when did she have the accident and died, because, the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner so ...if she died then, how could we of disposed – hidden her body. You know, when there’s an immediate [inaudible but sounds like he was about to say ‘search’] it’s just nonsense. And if she died when we were in the apartment or fell and di...why would we ...why would we cover that up?

Kate: and we’d hidden her so well that we’d decided we’d move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know, it’s just ridiculous

So let’s lets break their statements down.

1.       “Well when did she have the accident and died, because, the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner”

Gerry. You just answered your question. You were a 1.5 minute walk away. Kids can not fend for themselves. So if she was hurt, no one was there to help her. So this was exactly when she could have died. But please claim innocence since you were not technically there. Its not much different than leaving a child alone at the pool “for just a minute”. Its not safe and should not be done.  

Next statement.

“if she died then, how could we of disposed – hidden her body”

Gerry. Again, people kill and dispose of bodies EVERY SINGLE DAY. This is not impossible. This is not like the claims are you snapped your fingers and she was gone. There were many places to quickly leave the body.  I mean Gerry even lied about how long he talked to the friend he ran into. Stated it was about 15 minutes when the friend claimed it was only about 3. The fact that this time was greatly exaggerated at the EXACT time the “kidnapper” would have been running off with Madeleine is just too much of a coincidence. This gives Gerry several minutes to hide the body somewhere and return to the Tapas bar to wait for mommy to break the news.

Next statement.

“And if she died when we were in the apartment or fell and di...why would we ...why would we cover that up?’

Really Gerry? But then people have listened to this interview and did not question their guilt still. But seriously, if she was sedated, and let’s say she fell behind the couch and with out immediate help, died and remained there for about 1.5 hours.. Well, even if you claim you were home asleep, an autopsy would be done and if she had been sedated. That would show and you would now be held responsible. Lose your license etc. Again, same as I noted above. But so many still choose to not see this.   

And one last statement now added by Kate.

“and we’d hidden her so well that we’d decided we’d move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know, it’s just ridiculous”

Come on Kate. Statics alone on the number of “missing people” that are never found prove that this can be done. And people have moved bodies. If they panicked and hid the body someplace quick. Then later determined that they needed a better permanent spot… they could  have easily moved the body. Cause lets face it, even if there was a death in the rented apartment that had nothing to do with Madeleine, what are the odds that a death also occurred in the car you then rented. I mean, what are the odds that you rented that room that had someone die and a car that also someone died in?

And to be clear, those dogs were NEVER WRONG. The person above who is clearly on the “mccann payroll” stated that dogs are often wrong. That is just not true. Just because the body is no longer where the dogs hit. Or if the dogs hit on something that had transferred the scent, they are not wrong. They did hit on the scent of a dead human being in contact or transferred contact.  It has always been said they  hit on dead human scent but they can not distinguish who the scent belonged too. Just a dead human. So the dogs are not wrong. So that is just more of the typical BS people throw out with out the facts to confuse. Fact is the dogs did pick up the scent of a dead HUMAN. While they can not confirm it was a dead Madeleine. It was a dead human.  

So with that, what are the odds that a dead human was “behind the couch” in their vacation room and in the “trunk” of their vacation vehicle. I am sorry but you are talking about nearly impossible odds. Sure, it can happen. But what are those odds?

And those odds then coupled with innocent parents that had just had their child kidnapped? One in a zillion? I am just saying…

I know the Mccanns have spent more money suing people and well, paying their own bills than finding Madeleine. So I have to think that a lot of the supporters on these sites are also employed by them. They have made millions… So is is very possible. I have a full time job and have found time to write my thoughts.

The Maccann's interview with Sandra Felgueira

Sandra Felgueiras has done a few interviews with the Mccann’s. She clearly pushes buttons as Gerry typically goes into this rants that looks like he has parkinsons even though he normally sits perfectly still and speaks calmly. Unless he is asked about drugging his kids, the cadaver dogs or if he killed Maddie.

 

I really like her. She is asking  the hard questions and I think really proves the Mccann’ss are being dishonest.

Here is one of my favorites. 

Gerry’s reply is unreal…..And I think this was some leakage on his part.

http://youtu.be/o_KdIKe_Zds

Sandra:  “Now, when you look back, do you realize it could have been dangerous for Sean and Amelie to be left behind?”

GERRY: "i don’t think that’s right... and certainly in medical training, the first thing you get taught in an emergency situation is to get help

*********************************************************

Really Gerry, did you just say “medical training”. This is supposed to be a kidnapping. Now you are talking about medical training in an emergency situation.. This is alarming… But sure leads more to the theory that she had died.

They say that even when you are trying to lie, that you leak the truth. I think we had some leakage here.

*********************************************************

Sandra: “It never crossed your mind, Madeleine wouldn’t be able to cross (hard to understand this part clearly) the door just looking after you, alone?”

Kate: “If I can just explain what I found, the shutters….which had been down all week…. And when I went in… and there was a gust that blew the curtains open, that’s when I noticed that the shutter had been pulled off”

*********************************************************

So Kate does not answer the question. Refocuses to how she found her. But is not speaking in complete sentances either. And the shutters were pulled off?

 

Gerry said they were broken. Now Kate says they were “pulled off”

Both are lies. They were untouched.

 

*********************************************************

 

Mccann supporters wake the heck up!

I just read yet another support blog for the Gerry and Kate Mccann.

And it amazes me just how many people still believe them and blame the police despite what is so obvious to the rest of us with any common sense.

Why why why are people so naive and blind to the facts?

If the parents truly had no involvement, then these 2 have had just about the worst luck ever while still managing to stay clear of any legal responsibility. Even child endangerment for leaving babies alone. Which is illegal where I live and would and had this occurred here, they would have been arrested and CPS would have been involved .

But let’s break this down with just facts in the case and no theories or possible motives

So below I will include some facts and as the parents once stated they could provide for any evidence….. a “reasonable explanation” to each of them.  

You decide if it was just a mistake, bad luck that just happened to happen during this horrible time, or something more.

And its several things. So maybe it was just all a coincidence. But please read and then decide.

1.       The McCann’s stated that it was “normal” for their children to sleep through the night.

a.       It’s totally normal for all 3 kids in the same family to all normally sleep through the night

                                                               i.      May 1^st when the neighbor, Pamela Fern stated to police that she heard Madeleine crying from the McCann apartment beginning at approximately 10:30 pm until 11:45pmwas just lying. Even being sure it was Madeline and not the twins since the child was shouting “DADDY, DADDY” was just lying  

                                                             ii.     Madeleine asking them the next day why they didn’t come when they cried was just a random thought. She must have woke briefly and fallen right back to sleep     

                                                            iii.      Or, maybe……this was the one time she woke up… and was the only time they did not check every 15 minutes and was just an awful coincidence

2.       There was a chart at the home of the Mccann family offering stars for Madeleine for “staying in her bed” (there are photos confirming this chart)

a.       I am sure this was only during nap time and had nothing to do with her night time behavior since she normally slept through the night 

3.       It is totally safe to leave 2 and 3 year old children alone

a.       Sure, its only illegal in some locations because the laws are stupid

b.      2 and 3 year olds can fend for themselves, especially if its night time

c.       What could POSSIBLY go wrong in 30 minutes, or an hour or longer

                                                               i.      No child has ever died from an accident in the home or in their vacation unit

                                                             ii.      No child has ever had an accident while being checked every hour that caused great harm or death

4.       The Mccann’s stated in initial police statements that they unlocked the door each time they entered to do their checks and later changed this to using the unlocked side doors because they forgot

a.       This would be something you would totally forget

b.      And…..leaving a door unlocked that was near a PUBLIC street is totally safe

c.       The police lied

5.       The restaurant was not any different than being in your garden (backyard to us in America) as Gerry stated

a.       Sure it is Gerry. It takes me over a 1.5 mins to walk to my back yard from my back door

b.      And like in my backyard, you can hear your kids if they  need you or wake up

6.       They checked on the kids every 15 minutes

a.       Pamela Ferm who claimed the kids cried for over an hour lied

7.       Checking on kids every 15 minutes from the restaurant which was about a 1.5 minute walk each way would make for a fun and relaxing night out with friends and a much better option that hiring the onsite babysitter

a.       Sure, the chaos of the constant up and down of 9 people going back and forth every 15 minutes would not be distracting and this would be way easier

8.       The police were against the Mccann’s and did not try to help find the child and sought only to frame the Mccann’s

a.       I guess extensive searches by land, air and water being done was just for “show”

b.      The station set up in front of the apartment to take calls/tips 24/7 was just for “show”

c.       The thousands of people that helped search streets, homes, paths, trash etc was just for “show”

d.      The extensive search of the homes and apartments nearby just for “show”

e.      The extensive police files was just for “show”

                                                               i.      Yah, they did nothing to find this kidnapped child

f.        And… The lack of a single sign of an abduction was only because the police covered it all up and no one saw this and the Mccann’s have failed to publicly site any of these “cover ups” I guess out of fear 

9.       There REALLY were signs of an abduction

a.       The window in the kids room was open when Kate first discovered Madeleine missing

                                                               i.      She then closed it all up

                                                             ii.     Or….Someone must have come in and closed this to help with the cover up and framing of the parents

b.      The shutters were broken as Gerry stated

                                                               i.     Someone must have come in and fixed them to help with the cover up and framing of the parents

c.       Gerry and Kates family spokesperson later addressing that the window was closed and the shutters were not broken has no relevance

                                                               i.      The spokesperson lied and did not speak on their behalf as he had his own agenda

                                                             ii.      They must have been thinking of another night the window was open and the shutters were broken

                                                            iii.      Or… they were forced to stand by this false statement out of fear yet even years later, in their own country still fear for their safety               

1.       The book they wrote does not prove they are not fearful and they still have refused to call the police out for tampering with evidence of the break in because of well, fear?  

10.   After Kate discovered Madeleine was abducted and as she stated, was sure of, she then left the twins in the room ALONE to make the trip back to the table to notify the rest

a.       But she was just in shock and not thinking clearly or using an common sense OR natural motherly instincts to protect her remaining children from abduction as well and bring them with her or just scream for help

11.   The twins not waking up or even moving (several witnesses made this same observation). despite Kate’s screams (Neighbor Pamela Fern heard these screams and made statements to the police as such), frantic searches by the family/friends and the police, and moving to another room the twins did not wake or and they did not force them to wake up to simply make sure they were ok or see if they could possibly relay anything that had occurred

a.       This is normal, kids sleep through a traumatic events that involved screaming with many people trampling through a room is normal, right 

b.      And you would rather have the kids sleep through all this and not be concerned about them not waking or want to ensure they were ok and not hurt

12.   A cadaver dog picked up a scent on Kate’s clothing, Madeleine’s shirt and favorite toy (a toy which was on the bed but the scent was not picked up on the bed itself indicating the toy was placed here later), the closest and behind the couch

a.       For Kate’s clothes and Madeleine’s shirt and favorite toy to have the scent, that means that even as a part time GP, per her claims the week prior to the vacation, she would have to have come into DIRECT physical contact with at least one dead body for an extended period of time (needed in order to not only absorb the odor on to her clothes despite being washed , but to transfer to her childs clothes and toy)

                                                               i.      She then had her work clothes packed with ONLY Madeleine’s shirt and favorite cuddle toy allowing them to both absorb the odor

                                                             ii.      Or Eddie, the cadaver dog with years of experience and 100% accuracy was wrong.

b.      For the apartment, I guess Eddie, the cadaver dog with years of experience and 100% accuracy was wrong?

                                                               i.      Or… the hotel lied and there WAS a death in that apartment previously. A death where the dead body was moved from the closet to the floor behind the couch or vice versa

                                                             ii.     Or…..there was another murder in this very same room and the body was located behind the couch and the closet at some point 

13.   A Cadaver dog picked up the scent of a body on the key and the truck of the car the Mccann’s rented 20+ days after Madeleine disappeared.

a.       So again, I guess Eddie, the cadaver dog with years of experience and 100% accuracy was wrong AGAIN?

                                                               i.      Or, the rental car company lied and there had been a death in that car and he person was kept in the trunk with the keys in their pocket

                                                             ii.     Or…..Someone was murdered and then kept in the trunk with the keys in their pocket

14.   A Blood dog picked up the scent of bodily fluids (likely blood) behind the couch in the same location as the cadaver dog.

a.       This dog Keela with years of experience and 100% accuracy was WRONG too

b.      This is just a totally random coincidence

c.       Or there was a prior death behind the couch and again, the hotel lied

d.      Or there was a prior murder in this apartment and this is where it occurred

15.   DNA was an 88% match to Madeline

a.       The DNA was not a 100% to Madeleine

                                                               i.      The DNA sample was very limited which limits the testing but…. And, if this DNA had it not been Madeleine’s would have resulted in a 0% match. But I guess the lab made a mistake.

16.   Despite later comments by the parents that they themselves wondered if the twins may have been drugged,  they choose not to try to wake them to ensure they were safe and unharmed and take them to the hospital for testing to make sure they were not sedated at all during this time since a kidnapper had taken their other child and could have caused them harm

a.       This was only something they stated after it become public knowledge that the police suspected sedation because at the time, it just slipped their minds

b.      And why, if you had a child abducted and the remaining 2 did not wake up or move who would have any reason to be concerned for their safety. Just take them to another room and let them sleep. They must be fine if they are breathing and we do know Kate checked several times (the police witnessed Kate placing her hand over their nose mouth area several times)

17.   But they did have the Twins tested for drugs 4 months later       

a.       Even though the labs standard testing procedure of hair for drugs only covers 3 months back, it still proves they were not sedated 4 months later

b.      Or… maybe they had the tests done outside of laboratory standards. But this could only be done for Amalie since the length of Sean’s hair at the time (his hair was very short and based on how quickly hair typically grows would have been grown and cut) would just about guarantee that no hair remained from the time of the kidnapping

                                                               i.      And the fact Gerry and Kate never choose to get the testing done immediately was normal as why would anyone be concerned

                                                             ii.      Gerry and Kate also choosing not to provide any proof that tests were done further back on the hair samples or even done at all means nothing. Because well who needs proof, they have only had accusations made that they sedated the children and no charges were filed

                                                            iii.     And…. don’t care what anyone says or thinks as their only care is finding care Madeleine

c.       The other fact that they are doctors and likely are familiar with all the labs and the technicians in the area (they claim the tests were done in their home down) as well how testing is done has no relevance at all and this direct connection and special knowledge does not help them if they were trying to hide the fact that they sedated the kids as they would for sure be held to the same standards as the guy next door

d.      And…This testing would have been extensive because it’s a criminal investigation

                                                               i.      But no, the case was closed. This was not a test done by police as part of the investigation but rather Gerry and Kate’s own selected personal test but still proves they didn’t sedate their kids

18.   Gerry and Kate did not see any point ever in searching for their “kidnapped” daughter

a.       Totally normal and expected.  I know if my child was kidnapped, I would just wait for someone else to find him. I would even play tennis and go jogging in the days that followed. All what parents of missing kids just go about their lives

                                                               i.      The parents of missing kids 10-20-30 years later that are still haunted and devastated by the loss just need to get a grip and move on, it’s only a kid, just make another one

19.   Despite allegations and even being listed as suspects, Gerry and Kate Mccann refused to take a polygraph test

a.       Innocent parents always refuse to take a polygraph because so many have been wrongly convicted even though they are not admissible in court

20.   The McCann’s have a private fund to find Madeline and despite the allegations the fund has been mainly used to pay their personal and legal bills and only limited amounts have gone to actually find their daughter, they have done nothing to prove this wrong

a.       Again who cares about accusations? They are only focused on finding their child

21.   The McCann’s have spent more time, money and effort in fighting against Pat Brown and the main detective who have written books alleging their guilt over searching for their daughter

a.        Allegations in the books against these innocent parents is more important as it will affect the search for Madeleine

                                                               i.      The allegations are not new and those buying the books are likely those that already questioned their guilt and still despite Pat Browns book having been out for quite some time, media attention for a “abducted” Madeleine is still high

1.       This is not true and it greatly affected the search and they can prove it

22.   And last…. But not least… Statement Analysis has noted high levels of deception by both parents around the involvement in Madeline missing

a.       Statement analysis is wrong and has never been proven right. ……

 

Madeleine MacCann

I have a very strong opinion on this case.

 

I don’t say “theory” as I did not come to this on my own. I simply believe in this theory that others have come to based on what I know on this case. And I have added in some of why I fully the support the theory.

 

Now before we get started, while I have no clue if anyone will ever read this, if you do, and do not agree, I would love to hear why. But please do not waste our time with ‘just because I think so” or because of something you read on Kate or Gerrys blog. Use facts in the case and logic to support your argument. Otherwise I will just ignore it. I have gotten into debates on many cases with someone who can not see logic and it goes no where. They would argue that leaves are red just because that is how they see them with out any reason or logic. And nothing will change what they want to believe.

So again, I am open criticism on any case I discuss on my blog or a correction if I have the wrong facts. I do not care about your opinion unless there is some logic behind it.

So, my opinion is that Kate and Gerry are responsible for Madeleine’s disappearance.

 

A couple of things I want to highlight before I get into the details from my perspective.

 

1.      Gerry and Kate feel that 2 and 3 year old kids are safe alone despite being about a 2 minute walk away. I walk to my son to school to pick up him. It takes us 2.5 minutes and it is a block and a half away.  

2.      Kate claimed one child was kidnapped, but then proceeded to leave the room and the twins behind to go alert the others

3.      It has been said that the twins slept through Kate’s supposed screams, searching, police investigation, and transfer to another hotel.

4.      Gerry and Kate refused to take a polygraph

5.      Gerry and Kate refused to allow the twins to be drug tested for the first 5 months

6.      Gerry and Kate did not physically search for their missing child ever

 

So, I have read many theories, many sides. I have also read the parents views, listened to their statements etc and believe fully that they are guilty. That they drugged the kids. Madeleine likely died as a result of the drugging (either from the drugs themselves or was harmed due to the drugs) and they hid the body in order to avoid going to jail and well, losing everything.

So, I reviewed both many times and used as much of the “we know for sure” facts as I could.

 

Now,  I know there is more evidence and facts I know nothing about as in any case. I am not law enforcement so I have to base this off what information is available.

I may be wrong. I may be right.

So I am going to just jump right in.

Now the basis I think behind this whole ordeal is that they drugged the kids to ensure they would sleep through the night.

 

Now, they say that when someone is lying... They will avoid eye contact and that touching or pulling on their ears are both signs of deception.

 

Well, interesting... This lil clip they were asked directly if they gave the kids anything. Right as Gerry is denying this, I stopped the video. The link is then blow if you don't believe me.

 

And I need to add in, Gerry says "we will take any test", but... I guess the ole lie detector tests was not one of "any tests" they will take and refusing to allow the twins to be drug tested for 5 months only confirms that you are very well aware that drugs can remain in the system for some time. And from what I have been told, longer if there has been repeated use over time.

 

 

Link to the video:

 

http://youtu.be/O5jtmkXXv58

Now, to deviate a bit so I can explain for on my reasoning besides their guilty as fuck video.. 

That complaint from a neighboring guest was the clincher for me.

I can explain.

 

Let’s say you are 15. It is Friday night, you snuck out of the house. Then, your mom, on her way to bed, opened the door and saw your empty bed. 

So it’s now Saturday night, and you have made the decision to sneak out yet again. 

But, since you were caught last night because of the empty bed. Tonight you take extra precautions. You fill your bed with pillows and stick you old doll at the top so it appears that it is your hair laying on the pillow. Classic teen trick.

So…would it make sense if Friday night you get caught... Then Saturday you do the same thing?

No! Instead you now take that extra precaution to ensure that you don’t get caught AGAIN.  

Now Gerry and Kate tried to make us believe this “checking” on the kids.. every hour, or wait…. 30 minutes… No wait every 15 minutes…… Whatever it was…. I still call bullshit….was perfectly acceptable. 

 

Acceptable if your shitty parents. 

 

Which sorry, they are. THAT IS A FACT. 

And to side line quickly, go sit at your dinner table. Set you alarm to go off every 15 minutes. Then every 15 minutes when it goes off, get up, go outside and walk for 2 minutes... Stand there for a 1-2 minutes (imagine unlocking a door <remember they said they did this> and walking in to "check" on the kids) then walking back. Now sit down... The alarm will go off again soon. Now do it all over again. Now I am sure even if you only imagined doing this, you are still over this. Now imagine doing this as they claim every night several nights in a row. Now multiply this by several parents and imagine how much fun they would have? constant up and down and walking back and forth. No winder they refude to fo the reinactment. So, still think they were doing regular checks on the kids? 

They we're not. Trust me. 

So back on topic.... Now recall the Mccanns also tried to tell us their kids “always” slept through the night. 

 

What parent is lucky enough that they have 1 kid that will ALWAYS sleep through the night, but they expect us to believe that all 3 kids ALWAYS sleep through the night. At ages 2 and 3... I again call bullshit. Never! 

 

And this was in The Mccann household. Madeleine was rewarded for "staying in her bed"? 

Wait, I thought she was a sound sleeper and slept through the night?

Plus, we know that the night before, that did not happen… the neighbor guest reported their child crying in their room for OVER AN HOUR and the parents also told us that Madeliene asked them where they were. So not only were they NOT checking as often as they claimed, but the kids did wake up and their oldest called them out on it. 

 

So where someone with a temporary lack in judgment the night before may have felt comfortable leaving them alone again, I would expect now would choose to stay in or take advantage of the hotels childcare services. 

Instead,  Gerry and Kate choose to AGAIN leave their small children alone unattended. 

Now, it is VERY likely the kids could again wake up. And again, go unattended. Cause while you may buy the insane every 15 minute check BS, I do not. They were unattended.  Add in the risk that a neighbor guest could call and complain AGAIN.....this would cause some red flags (such as report to police etc) and I do not think mom an dad were about to risk this. 

 

Maybe. 

 

But I don’t think so. 

 

So that is where I believe the drugging of the kids came into play. 

Now, I would expect them to have done this before. But that is very much just my assumption. And Kate having made a career, well, of putting people to sleep, I think it would be very simple for her to do. So everyone that defends them and states they did not give them Cepol (or what ever that popular British drug is) could be right. That has been compaired to NyQuil in the states. And while it would put a child to sleep, they would not sleep through the chaos that would have gone on with the room searches, police, eye running all over. That would take something more. Something I am sure doctors would be able to get their hands on.

 

So.... To sum it up..  I would think they did take at least one precaution to ensure they were not again reported. I think that precaution was sedation. 

 

Now, from what I have been able to find it appears this theory that the children were drugged was due to the fact that as I mention above, the twins slept through Kate yelling, the police investigation, people coming and going and being transferred to another hotel……The twins never woke up. And this is also a fact that has not been disputed by Gerry and Kate. Kate even try's to blame possible drugging on the "kidnapper". Sorry, that's a stretch. But if that crossed her mind, why not take them to the hospital and demand testing. An innocent person would be concerned their children did not wake up. They were not. That is also alarming. 

 

So, do you buy that? That they were just super sound sleepers? Both kids? 

 

Well, Beleive what you want, but I call bullshit yet again. 

 

 

So let’s assume they were drugged to ensure they would sleep through the parents night out with friends.

 

If there was an accident in the process, Madeleine fell, was dropped, etc and that killed the child. 

Now my personal theory is that Madeleine got up (if she was drugged would be groggy) and in looking for her mom and dad crawled on the couch trying to look out the window and fell.. There was blood and after laying there for sometime unattended too, died. (This also explains both the blood and cadavour scent behind the couch. And since a dead body would need to have laid there for sometime (I have read it takes about 2 hours after death for the body to begin the process that would result in the cadavour scent) then this also rules out the checks as they stated since they would have found her sooner. 

 

What options do they have. Really? 

Call the authorities?  

No! Being doctors especially, they know the drugs would show up in an autopsy. Then mom and dad are being charged with 2^nd degree murder. Would likely be convicted, they would go to jail, lose their other kids and their licenses to practice medicine. 

Or they claim the child was kidnapped.

So which option would you choose. For them, I think it was more about them and their freedom. 

And not that I would ever leave my children alone, I know if I was in that situation, my concern would be for the welfare of my living children. 

 

So, I think they made a choice to call this an abduction. To save the livelihood of the remaining family.  

 

And that they had to put on their game face and play that role.

 

That is why they did not search

That is why they refused to answer so many questions

That is why they refused to take a polygraph

And that is why they refused to allow the twins to be tested in that first 5 months

And, the Tapas group. The only reason I could see that they would stand by this charade would be if they possibly all took advantage of this sedation.

I mean think about it, of that's what caused Maddies death, any of them could have been in the same situition...  And if they implicate Gerry and Kate, if their own kids were also drugged... They implicate themselves. 

So I think that's is why this group stood by their story. They were all in just as deep.... 

And regardless, children should not be left alone. It is a crime in most states in the US. 

 

And for those of you with kids (and the media who seem to think this was harmless) think about your kids at the age of 2 and 3. Just imagine for a moment. I know I recall my son at these ages. 

You have to watch them every minute. They are walking, crawling, grabbing. They want to touch and feel everything. Put it in their mouth. Grab, pull, climb. 

This is why it is a crime in so many places. For the simple fact that at this young of an age, being left alone is just flat out dangerous. And for this group, selfish! 

 

Daddy can try to minimize all he wants be comparing it to be in the "back garden" (which I equate to a back yard for those of us in America). But no!  BULLSHIT Gerry Mccann!

 

This is NOT the same on any level. 

 

If you are in your back yard, your child can get up and come get you if needed. If they are crying, they can be heard and tended too. A TWO minute walk away at restaurant with several adults talking and drinking…. 

 

NEVER.

 

Even if they were checking every 15 minutes which I do not believe, imagine leaving your 2 or 3 year old alone for 15 minutes. Imagine how much they could get into. Follow a 2 year old around for a even just 5 minutes and you will understand.

 

Sure it was night, and as they claim, they sleep through the night, but we already know this is not true.

So that Gerry, is “rubbish” as you would put it.

So, fact, this is is dangerous. Yet despite their perceived intelligence, and well, ability to even obtain childcare at the hotel, they choose to put their children at risk in order to “hang out” with friends. 

Not to mention, Madeline had free reign to simply get out of bed (she was not in a confined crib) and walk around. The twins were a little safer being in the portable cribs. But, my son at the age of 2, had learned out to get out of his regular full size crib. So, again, I have to call them out on their sheer lack of concern for the welfare of their kids. 

Selfish much?

No good parent would ever consider this option. A good parent would get child care or stay in.

So at this point, we know that the night before, they were not checking as often as they stated. The simple fact the guest stated the child had cried for over an hour proves this. Fact!

 

And I also think that is why Kate decided to skirt around the complaint by telling us herself that Madeleine asked them “where were you last night”. But what she did was twist that to be an “attempted abduction” the night before. 

I again feel a strong need to call serious BULLSHIT here. This to me says a lot. And to me plays more into their cover up story. I mean seriously? Do people beleive this? The answer is yes. People are that niave! 

 

But wtf, why would that be your first thought rather than the kids just woke up and there was NO ONE there to tend to them. Now it's an attempted abduction? Please. 

 

And even more OBVIOUS..... I'm, Madeline asked you where you were. So... Guess what BITCH, she can talk. I am sure had a "kidnapper" woke them, Madeliene would have seen them and stayed "someone was in our room" rather than where were you?".  

But please by all means, despite all this obvious bullshit, beleive them. 

 

But I beleive had there been a strange man in their room, she would have told them.

So the fact that they inserted this ridiculous comment here again, only added to their guilt in my eyes and their "abdication" story to them. 

This is what is called explaining it into your story.  

 

And what happened when discussed in interviews....  the reporters all proceed with the interview. No one stopped asked them to explain this bullshit. But I think it's clear many times interviers miss these chances to clarify. 

 

I know I found myself yelling at the television many times over this. It just seemed absurd!

 

 

So they expect us to believe the kids always slept through the night. But they didn’t the night before. And the night Madeleine was “abducted” that they (well the twins anyways) did sleep through. 

Even during the police investigation, and changing hotels. They did not wake once? But a possible abductor who would be as quiet as possible… That woke them? Sure! 

 

Now let’s talk about the blood and cadaver dogs. 

But Gerry and Kate said these dogs are "unreliable". That's right. That's why thousands of dogs world wide are used to find dead and alive bodies, drugs, etc. cause they are so unreliable? 

But let's talk more about Eddie and Keela. Both of these dogs were extremely experienced and had a track records of 100% accuracy. They say the more experience the stronger their accuracy... Just an FYI. 

 

Now one can argue it did not meet levels for the blood and we have no proof it was the dead body of Madeleine and that is true. But let’s look at this a little more.

 

Now the blood DNA match which was 88% linked to Madeleine, while it is too low to be inadmissible in court, when you consider not only that 16% of the sample was not usable and the fact that someone has no relation to a DNA sample would results in a 0% match, you have to give this some weight. 

But I do understand that there is still a lot of controversy over this testing. And even if this was 100%, it does not prove anything other than there was blood in the room. And let’s face it, kids do bleed. I am logical. I can let this one go. 

 

 

But, really sold me on the actual death however, was the cadaver dog.  And the multiple hits. To include Madeleines favorite toy. 

Now mom excuses it stating she came into contact with 6 dead bodies the week before her vacation.

 

How, I have read that to transfer the scent, she would have had to be in direct physical contact (touching) the dead body for several minutes. Now while I find it unlikely as a part time GP she came into contact with even one dead body, much less 6, I think its safe to say that assuming she did, she would then have needed to be pressed up against them for several minutes. On her pants? Madeleines FAVORITE toy? Is this reasonable? 

I do not buy it. But please, add this to the list of crazy shit that could have happened. Your right, it's all just random bad luck that happened the night their child goes missing. 

 

But so let's assume for the sake of argument that Kate held 6 dead bodies, or even just one. Maybe cuddle cat was in her pocket that day at work... So what caused the scent. There was a dead body in several places in that room. This is a fact. So... Did they again have such bad luck (again) to get the one room that someone died in? And if someone had just died, they would not leave traces in the closet and behind the couch... On a couch, or a bed sure. But not a closet. Not happening unless... Maybe there was a murder in there before. Or maybe it was 2 different deaths? 

But the hotel stated no one had died in the room. So the only option would be a former murder, being that it was not known. 

And let's say someone did in fact diezz how often do people die actually die on vacation and again, leave the scent behind the couch and in the closest? 

And then it was again found in the car they rented.

So what now? We have 2 separate vacation rentals. A hotel and car. Both had a dead body in them? What are the odds? And on the key ring too? Did the person die accidently in the trunk holding the car key? Sure. Totally happens! 

 

Are we adding another just shitty peice of luck? 

And last but not least.

 

The simple fact is that they did not look for their child. EVER.  This does it more for me towards their guilt than the mountain of evidence. 

 

I have seen parents more frantic, going door to door, crying and upset over the family pet. 

 

Gerry and Kate do not show any signs of frantic parents looking for their "abducted" child. But more parents that are trying to “play the part” of an abduction to keep from facing charges. 

 

So, that is why, for those that still think they are innocent, that they continue to “appear” to be looking. 

Looking if you consider running marathons, accepting money into a fund (a fund that unlike most is private), going on talk shows and suing people that wrote about their guilt.. is looking. That brings home missing kids. Right? 

Nope. But it brings in money, keeps up appearances of that of an abduction but does nothing to find Maddie. 

 

And, like I said, this private "Find Madeleine” fund is not regulated as most are. And from what I have read, they can and have used it to pay for their bills. That less than 17% has been used to search for their daughter.  So 83% has been used for their own personal needs.  If your child was "kidnapped" would you use 83% on well, personal needs? And a measly 17% to find your missing child? 

They are not broke. Someone on a blog tried to argue they were. Please? 

Gerry has returned to work. The fund continues to bring in donations. And they are paid when they do talk shows. 

So why then would you spend only 17% to find your missing daughter. 

In fact, they have even spent more on lawyers to fight the release of books written by Goncalo Amaral  and Pat Brown (profiler). Both have very similar beliefs as to what happened. Similiar to the theory that i too support. 

So why, if you only wish to find your daughter, do you feel the need to not only spend more money, but time in this fight? If you are innocent? Why? 

 

Those that stand by them as innocent will not buy the books. Those that already think they are guilty will, but it will not change their views. 

 

Still they have supporters. Millions. And still they have those that think they are guilty. These books are not changing that. 

 

So Gerry and Kate,  why are you not putting that effort into looking for your child?

 

Peter Hyatt who writes a blog about statement analysis (I have a post on this) wrote something once that really makes so much sense. 

 

I am paraphrasing but.... He said....

 

Imagine being in the store. You turn your  back for a moment, and your child is gone.

What do you do? 

 

Many parents have experienced this. I know for me, the split second of panic was horrifying. And it was but seconds. 

 

Yet I found myself frantically calling his name and I began looking immediately!

It was instinctive! 

Now imagine this happens. Instead of searching the store, calling out and going up and down every isle and looking under every rack…..you go about shopping. Go home and just wait and hope someone calls that they found her.

Gerry and Kate did just that . They sat and just waited.

They did not spend one minute looking. But will spend months fighting someone from writing a book.



 

So after knowing that Kate and Gerry NEVER once searched for Madeleine…. Add in the refusal to answer questions… 

 

How do you explain this and stand by their innocence? Innocent parents search. 

 

Natalie Holloways parents went to Aruba. Her parents tracked down Joren. Her parents hounded him when he denied he knew her. Her parents knocked down the doors of crack houses putting themselves in danger, dug in landfills, garbage cans etc searching for anything.

 

Now ask your self again, would you look for your kid or would you continue your vacation?

 

Kate and Gerry after a couple days NOT searching…. Continued their vacation. 

 

The Holloways have dug, fought, searched, knocked down doors, tracked people down to find their child. 

 

So? 

 

Still think the McCann’s are innocent?

 

Give me one reason why?

 

 

But....if you believe they are innocent that means the following: 

 

The McCann’s did nothing wrong leaving 2 and 3 yr olds alone. 

That sitting at a loud restaurant drinking and talking a 2 MINUTE walk away is the same as being in your back yard.

 

You need to think that the police did nothing to help find madeleine. The thousands of people that searched on foot, land and water did nothing to help find Madeleine. That this "file" on the case also shows how little was done. 

 

Refusing to answer questions is what innocent parents do. It's you against the police when you have a missing kid. They are the enemy. 

 

That the very experienced cadaver and blood dogs with many years of exp and well, only a 100% accuracy, were this one time….. were wrong. The multiple hits were all just due to the lack of training and exp and their track record proves they are wrong. 100% accuracy does not mean they are accurate.

OR 

Someone did die in their rental apartment AND rental car and the body was once in the closet and the trunk. The hotel and car rental company just lied.

 

That they refused to take polygraphs because innocent people fail them all the time when telling the truth 

 

2 and 3 year olds  always sleep through the night even fall right asleep super early even with extra stimulation like being on a fun vacation with several other kids

 

That it's more important to stop the release of books that claim your guilty rather than find your child 

And last but not least.... 9 days later..., while your child is still missing... On her birthday you would look this happy... Now they stated that the laughter was because some balloons flew in their face. But imagine a devestating time in your life. Is anything funny? Your child was kidnapped as you claim and could be cold, hungry, scared but sure balloons would take all this horror away. They look devestated and horrified don't they. 

So, you are saying, the police are wrong, the dogs are wrong, and I guess I must be too if you believe the bs they are trying to sell.

 

Good for you!

You failed the common sense test. 

You probably also think Michael Jacskn is innocent and thinks its totally normal for a grown man to have little boys sleep in his bed frequently and an alarm on your bedroom door that rings when anyone comes I'm.