Missing child or homicide?

Each time I hear a story of a missing child it breaks my heart. There are so many evil people out there, that the thought of what they could be going through is horrifying.

What is worse however, is the thought that the child is actually harmed by mom or dad… or both.

It seems like we have had so many missing cases over the last few years that look more like harm came to the child in their own home by the very people that should protect them with their own lives.

I have talked about a couple of these cases on my blog. It is infuriating. What is even more infuriating is that these parents are getting away with it. 

How is it that the average Joe Citizen is outsmarting the police? Some of these average Joes are druggies who struggle to survive, hold down a job etc. but they are getting away with murder? These are not rocket scientists. 

Have police gotten lazy, stupid? Or are these monsters just getting smarter.

I am just not sure anymore.

But I see past the bullshit even if the physical evidence does not exist. 

For me, there two main things that a parent of a missing child will do that immediately takes me from a missing child case to a potential murder/cover up.

 

1.       They do not search/call out for the child

2.       They speak of the child in past tense.

 

Let’s discuss this further.

 

1)       Mom and dad do NOT search or call out for the child

How do you NOT search? Your child is missing and you sit at home and do what? Wait? Wait for what. The only reaction is searching.

Most of us parents have had the child dart under the clothes rack at the store, or wander to the next isle. We know that panic. I have felt it. It was the clothes rack. It was seconds and the fear that overcame me is unexplainable. FEAR, PANIC. A loving parent feels nothing less.

I follow a blog about Statement analysis by Peter Hyatt. He made a comment about a parent that does not search. He basically said it would be like losing your child at the store and instead of frantically searching, you got in your car, went home and waited for someone else to find them. I don’t know a single parent that would do that.

So when I see this lack of searching…..I am instantly concerned and begin to see the parents as the main suspect.

 

The panic, fear. It should take over. It should be a natural instinct as a loving parent. There is no other reaction. I have seen cases where mom and dad searched till they could not walk, searched places that were dangerous, dug in trash dumpsters, searched high and low. That is the only type of parent that should be a parent. The rest in my mind are guilty.  Even if it is not of murder, but neglect.

One thing that I have seen for years is that so many people wish to dispute these expected reactions from mom and dad. Callers on the Nancy Grace show, followers of a blog, etc. I see it over and over and over again. The response is always “everyone reacts different”.

This is always said in defense of the mom and dad. 

One example I have seen was with the case Isabel Celis (see my blog post on this case). Mom and dad did nothing. They did not search and they did not speak out. Instead, they sat in their home for 2 weeks. When they finally emerged…. Only because they pressured…. What was the reason mom gave for not speaking out…. “WE WERE GREIVING”. 

FAIL. 

While I can understand this word to some degree, I just find that choice of words very out of order for a “KIDNAPPING”. 

The child is just missing. She could have wondered off. Typically people do not grieve immediately after they discover their child missing but rather go into a panic, they are fearful, they are motivated to find that child.

To sit in your room and cry is something that I would expect when you got the news that the child was found deceased. Even if months have gone by with no leads I can under stand grieving. 

But immediately after, your natural instinct would be to find them. 

My cousins little girl walked out of the house once. The door was shut but we think the wind blew it back upen and she walked out. 

Now, she was found safe. Let me start with that..... She just walked to the house next door and was quietly playing in the back yard. 

But it was a good 3 minutes before she was found. My cousin (her mom) was in a panic I have never seen before. She was screaming her name, she was running, looking under every tree, in every yard, SCREAMING. People were coming out of their homes and began helping. They began searching their yards and that is where she was found.

Now imagine this same scenario. Imagine that my cousin just closed the door and cried. Does that make any sense to you?

Then how these people can excuse that behavior is beyond me.

There is no excuse.

If you do not search…... If you do not call out for your child….  You are now the prime suspect in my mind. And I am at this point concerned the child is in fact not alive and you know this. You know there is nothing to search for.

PERIOD.

 

Sergio and Becky Celis  

Gerry and Kate Mccann

Billie Jean Dunn

Justin DiPietro

Greg and Ericka Lewis

To me you are all responsible for your Child’s disappearance. Your actions from day one told me that. Your continued lack of concern, effort, or action has proven it over time. 

 

2)       Mom and dad speak of the child in past tense

Let me ask you a question. You don’t even need to be a parent.

Tell me about your mom, dad, sister, son, cousin. Pick one that is alive and well. Tell me how you would describe them.

Would you say:

They WERE funny.

They WERE loving.

They WERE sweet.

I LOVED her/him

Or would you say:

They ARE funny.

They ARE loving.

They ARE sweet.

I LOVE her/him

 

If they are alive, they “ARE FUNNY”. If they are alive you “LOVE THEM”. Using past tense when your child is MISSING, tells us that in your mind, that child is not “missing” and ALIVE but no longer living.

This goes back to what I have learned in statement analysis.

As a child we learned pronouns. We learned verb tense. It is one thing that is used every time we speak. It is instinctive. Its natural.

Verb tense does not lie.

We speak of our kids, our spouse in present tense. 

It is that simple. Verb tense does not lie.

 

 

Parents that do not search, may just be neglectful. But parents that do both…..do not search, call out and speak of the child in past tense….

To me, they are guilty. 

Period. 

 

Isabel Celis

So the case of “missing” Isabel Celis was back in the news in the recent months. Local law enforcement was hoping to get some new leads. 

Now, I believe mom and dad are responsible for Isabel’s disappearance. Their latest statements have confirmed my beliefs.

When the news showed back up on their door step, instead of 2 parents desperate to find their daughter and grateful that they are looking again…. This is what they said to reporters. 

Now to be clear, I listened to the video to transcribe Beckys statement for a good 30 minutes.. I had to replay and pause several times. So, what you are about to read is what she said. It was akward and I struggled to make any sense of it in any way or see a mother who is still out there trying to find her baby girl. 

BECKY: It’s a good thing.. It’s a thing that you know and you see them and you know that there are gonna.. they are trying um im hoping that what.. yah know that’s the thought that they are trying and trying to get what they need out of this and so it’s a positive but has a negative effect too, it does bring back the memories of the whole thing. 

SERGIO: "We have a lot of questions that aren't answered, a lot of things that we wish we could just close the book on. But until then, there's so many things that are left so wide open. You know, they did so much digging right here right here, in our house, right here between me and Becky, into our family, you know, we have already been stripped away from our little daughter and we were violated all over again. And we're hoping that this time around maybe someone else can get the attention. And maybe that, you know, all that strength, and all that force, can go somewhere else and we can really get down to a lot of answers," 

Then when Becky was asked what she wanted to say to Isabel if she was listening and she said this

BECKY: “Baby we're still looking for you, baby. Don't give up and don't give up here. We're still out here, looking. Don't give up. We haven't given up so we hope that she never does, either," 

Interesting… Sergio NEVER says he wants his daughter home. Just that he wants the attention off them. If your child was kidnapped, and you didn’t know if she was hurt, scared, in pain, would your focus be on you or your child? Mine would be on my child.

And note that Becky does not talk about Isabel as I would expect her too. And to say they are “still out here looking” I wish the reporters would ask “what have you done too search” cause I don’t believe they have done a thing 

She rambles for on sometime and says nothing really about wanting her child home. 

I don’t trust these parents and I am so upset that nothing has been done. 

HERE IS THE LINK:   http://www..tucsonnewsnow.com/story/24463241/tpd

Is anyone buying Oscar Pistorious’s story?

I for one am NOT.

First of all, who breaks into a home then locks themselves in a bathroom stall?

NO ONE!

Then if you are lying in bed with your partner, if you hear a noise, I think most of us wake them up. I know I have heard noises and my immediate response is to wake up my husband. 

Now, I get the whole being scared, living in a high crime country and having had death threats. But if you are scared, and you have 2 paths of about equal distance…. A robber in a closed bathroom stall or getting out of your home to safety, what would you do?

I think if you are scared to death, so much so that even turning the lights was too scary… you are not rushing towards a robber. You would want to rush from them. 

I think very few would choose to confront the robber. Especially if you think they are in a small closed room the opposite direction of the exit.

I just don’t buy that.

Here is the floor plan. Decide for yourself.  

But to me, I think if you were faced with this, and were sure the noise was coming from the toilet, wouldn’t you assume it was your partner? If not, my first reaction would be to wake up my spouse. Not just start shooting. 

He then states “I felt trapped as my bedroom door was locked and I have limited mobility on my stumps”. WHAT? How are you trapped in a locked bedroom door when you are in that bedroom? He was not locked in. This sounds more like someone trying to explain why he didn’t get Reeva and bolt out of the apartment. Since again, it would have been quicker to leave the bedroom and possibly get out of the house than going into the bathroom. 

Now we have heard from neighbors who have stated that they hear “blood curdling” screams from a WOMAN followed by shots then screams from Oscar.

Does that sound like what Oscar claims happened? Not at all. Sure it’s his word against theirs but there is more than one person that heard the screams from a woman and it does not benefit them to lie. Oscar on the other hand is trying to save his own life. He has all the motivation to lie. 

I also have a big issue with when he chooses to put on his prosthetic legs. If you thought you had robbers in your home….. And you were on stumps…. I would think for the sheer ability to have better movement, this is when he would have put on his legs. Instead he claims he went after a robber on his stumps. Putting himself at even greater risk(not being able to run) and then upon discovering it was Reeva in the bathroom, then now takes the time to put on the stumps. Then instead of calling the police first, he phones a friend.

He sure took his time.  

If you have a life on the line, who would you call first? Would you call for help or would you put on your stumps and call a friend?  

This case really looks to me like murder after a fight. 

My theory matches what many have said.

They fought. 

She became scared and ran to the bathroom and locked the door. 

He chased her.

I then think that he initially tried to get to her in the locked bathroom by hitting the door with the bat. I think he would have hit her with that.  I think when that did not work, he went back and got his gun and shot her. I think he then still could not get into the room and hit the door again. I think if she had been alive still, he would have still killed her. 

I think in his anger, it was his intention to kill Reeva. He may or may not feel remorse now. But I do think the majority of the crying is at least due to his sheer fear of going to jail and not about Reeva. 

Oscar Pistorious

Is anyone buying Oscar Pistorious’s story? 

I for one am NOT.

First of all, who breaks into a home then locks themselves in a bathroom stall?

NO ONE!

Then if you are lying in bed with your partner, if you hear a noise, I think most of us wake them up. I know I have heard noises and my immediate response is to wake up my husband. 

Now, I get the whole being scared, living in a high crime country and having had death threats. But if you are scared, and you have 2 paths of about equal distance…. A robber in a closed bathroom stall or getting out of your home to safety, what would you do?

I think if you are scared to death, so much so that even turning the lights was too scary… you are not rushing towards a robber. You would want to rush from them. 

I think very few would choose to confront the robber. Especially if you think they are in a small closed room the opposite direction of the exit.

I just don’t buy that.

Here is the floor plan. Decide for yourself.  

But to me, I think if you were faced with this, and were sure the noise was coming from the toilet, wouldn’t you assume it was your partner? If not, my first reaction would be to wake up my spouse. Not just start shooting. 

He then states “I felt trapped as my bedroom door was locked and I have limited mobility on my stumps”. WHAT? 

Ok,initially this sounded pretty bogus but I have sense learned that the locks in his home were the old style with keys that lock the door. AND, that he locks his door at night. 

Interesting... 

This is now part of my overall theory I will discuss below.

Now we have heard from neighbors who have stated that they heard "blood curdling” screams from a WOMAN followed by shots then screams from Oscar.

Does that sound like what Oscar claims happened? Not at all. Sure it’s his word against theirs but there is more than one person that heard the same screams from a woman and it does not benefit them to lie. Oscar on the other hand is trying to save his own life. He has all the motivation in the world to lie. 

I also have a big issue with when he chooses to put on his prosthetic legs. If you thought you had robbers in your home….. And you were on stumps…. I would think for the sheer ability to have better movement, this is when he would have put on his legs. Instead he claims he went after a robber on his stumps. Putting himself at even greater risk(not being able to run) and then upon discovering it was Reeva in the bathroom, then now takes the time to sit down put on the stumps. Then instead of calling the police first, he phones a friend.

He sure took his time.  

If you have a life on the line, who would you call first? Would you call for help or would you put on your stumps and call a friend?  

This case really looks to me like murder after a fight. 

My theory matches what many have said.

They fought. 

I think that at some point during the fight, Reeva may have felt threatened. BUT, since the bedroom was locked (let's assume he kept the key elsewhere) so leaving the room was just not an option. So the only place she could get distance from Oscar was the toilet stall. 

I also think it's possible she was going to leave, but he got to the bedroom door first and grabbed the key preventing her from leaving. 

She then became scared and ran to the bathroom, the only place left to run and locked the door. With the key. 

He chased her. 

I then think that he initially tried to get to her in the locked bathroom by hitting the door with the bat. I think he would have hit her with that had he gotten to her. 

I think when that did not work, he went back and got his gun and shot her. 

I think he then either was still trying to get to her or at this point he snapped out of his rage in light of what he had done and still could not get into the bathroom and hit the door again breaking a panel so he could reach in and unlock the door. I think if she had been alive still, depending on his state of mind, he may have still killed her. 

I think in his anger, it was his intention to kill Reeva. He may or may not feel remorse now. But I do think the majority of the crying is at least due to his sheer fear of going to jail and not about Reeva. 

The tears and vomiting could be that he realizes that he could spend the rest of his life in jail. 

Being that he has a judge that is outspoken about violence against women and has even put a cop behind bars, I think that rules out any chance she can be bought or feel sympthay for him. 

I think the odds are against him.

If I had to vote today, I would say he will be convicted. 

I will post my thoughts after he testifys.

This should be interesting. Much like Jodi Arias. Lies. 

Burglars kidnapped Madeleine now?

Wow... The level of bullshit on this case never stops piling up.

Yet there are still many that think she was kidnapped and her parents are just victims.

It kills me just how stupid people are.

Gerry and Kate Mccann need to be held accountable!

Why do people really still buy in to the bullshit?

Are people still that naïve, stupid?

Apparently they do. Look at all the supporters in the comments supporting them. 

Do some searching. Read other articles, blogs. There are even entire blogs that support them. Blogs that find a reason to excuse every lie, discrepancy, bad decision. Why?

I am so fed up with the lies and the blame being pushed on others.

The only true blame lies with mom and dad. Mom and dad left their babies ALONE.  Even if the child was simply abducted (which I think is a flat out lie) had they been there, I do not think it would have happened.

And for the LOVE OF PETE….There is a reason 2 and 3 year olds are not to be left alone. It is DANGEROUS.

FACT FACT FACT. DANGEROUS.

Nothing else is more important.

I am a mom. I know what my son could do at the age of 2. At the age of 3. I would never have left him alone. Even at the age of 6 I do NOT leave him alone. In fact, where I live it is ILLEGAL to leave a child under the age of 13 alone. And had the Mccanns done that here, they would have been arrested and charged with child endangerment. FACT again. Yet in this case, they are almost hero’s that suffered something that they had no part in.

Really? Leaving your children alone is your fault. No one else is to blame.

I  have a huge family. I babysat most of my teen years. I know what kids that age can and do AND get into. In minutes. So to put them alone for hours?

And we all know that at least 2 days prior to Madeline missing, they were not checking as they claimed. We all know that the woman upstairs heard a child crying for OVER AN HOUR. This is a fact! The parents even tried to minimize this by saying Madeleine asked them where they were. But hey  mom and dad, even if she quickly dropped it… its still an issues. Not only did she NOT sleep through the night, even with this, you continued to leave them alone.

So the simple fact here is that mom and dad left babies alone. ALONE.  

And we know that the kids did wake up. So why the hell did you continue to do so?

One reason. They were Selfish!

PERIOD.

There is no excuse.

The steps from the room to the Tapas bar was traced by several people…

It is a 1.5 minute walk. FACT FACT FACT. Can I say this again, that this is a fact.

This is not like being in your backyard (garden) as Gerry claims. I have sat in my back yard and yah know what, my kid has needed me and he was able to just come to the backyard and get me. Or if he cried, I can hear him. FACT.

A 1.5 minute walk is more like being in the backyard (garden) 6 houses down the road. You can not hear your child cry. You can not tend to them if there is an accident. It is dangerous.

So why why why do all of you stupid people still think they are innocent??????

Stop being stupid and wake the heck up!

This was not a bad decision. This was a life altering horrible selfish decision. Gerry and Kate are to blame and have not for one second ever even owned this blame. They excuse this behavior as totally acceptable. When it’s not!

They choose to hang out, eat and drink too far to hear the kids…..despite the dangers that are there for young children.

So right off the bat, at the least there should have been charges for that. Yet none were made.

We instead have the blame put on the police. They did nothing.

Well, anyone that wishes to make this claim needs to do some research. That is a lie. Nothing more. There was more done to find this child than just about any case in the world. Searches were immediate. They were done on land, in water and in the air. How often do you see missing kids searched for by boat and air? You don’t. But I guess in this case, it happening still makes people say they did nothing really to help. Sounds to me more like mom and dad trying desperately to put the focus on anyone but them and their own shit decisions.

Then if that was not enough… the lies and refusal to help this case continued.

Both stated that the shutters were broken, jimmied, open.  This is a fact. It was said by both.

Gerry even stated that he went out side and tested the shutters and they COULD be opened from outside.

Why would anyone need to flat out lie about those shutters? If your child was kidnapped and you are innocent. Why would you lie about those shutters?

But they both lied about them.

Because the fact here is that the shutters were not open. They were not broken. And they CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE.This was tested and proven to be a fact. THEY CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE with out being broken. They were not broken.

Also, mom and dad also stated themselves that the shutters had been closed the entire trip until this night. So if this is true, why then were moms fingerprints on the shutters? If they never opened them, Kates fingerprints would not be there. But they were. Again, I am talking about facts. 

Also, Gerry stated that when he got back to the room with Kate after she came running to tell him Madeleine was taken, that the shutters were OPEN. So, now we have mom leaving the twins ALONE AGAIN in the same room where the claim Madeline was “kidnapped” but she even left those shutters OPEN. REALLY?

So ask yourself why would anyone lie about this?  

There is only one logical reason. They needed to lie. They needed to support their kidnapping story.

Why? Well, if there was an accidental death, and like I believe. the children had been sedated they must lie. An autopsy would show the sedation.

·         They would be charged for her death  

·         They would lose their licenses to practice medicine

·         And would likely lose their other children.

Lots of motive here to lie. Yet still people ignore these facts in the case.

Why would the police need to lie?

And I watched one of their interviews where Gerry and Kate made the following comments. Those are pasted below directly from the transcripts.

 I am now going to answer each of the questions or points Gerry claims were basically nonsense. This is not some crazy theory. It’s not like police are claiming she was abducted by aliens. The theory police have matches the evidence.

Gerry: I mean the ludicrous thing is erm what, I suppose what’s been purported from Portugal is that Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body. Well when did she have the accident and died, because, the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner so ...if she died then, how could we of disposed – hidden her body. You know, when there’s an immediate [inaudible but sounds like he was about to say ‘search’] it’s just nonsense. And if she died when we were in the apartment or fell and di...why would we ...why would we cover that up?

Kate: and we’d hidden her so well that we’d decided we’d move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know, it’s just ridiculous

So let’s lets break their statements down.

1.       “Well when did she have the accident and died, because, the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner”

Gerry. You just answered your question. You were a 1.5 minute walk away. Kids can not fend for themselves. So if she was hurt, no one was there to help her. So this was exactly when she could have died. But please claim innocence since you were not technically there. Its not much different than leaving a child alone at the pool “for just a minute”. Its not safe and should not be done.  

Next statement.

“if she died then, how could we of disposed – hidden her body”

Gerry. Again, people kill and dispose of bodies EVERY SINGLE DAY. This is not impossible. This is not like the claims are you snapped your fingers and she was gone. There were many places to quickly leave the body.  I mean Gerry even lied about how long he talked to the friend he ran into. Stated it was about 15 minutes when the friend claimed it was only about 3. The fact that this time was greatly exaggerated at the EXACT time the “kidnapper” would have been running off with Madeleine is just too much of a coincidence. This gives Gerry several minutes to hide the body somewhere and return to the Tapas bar to wait for mommy to break the news.

Next statement.

“And if she died when we were in the apartment or fell and di...why would we ...why would we cover that up?’

Really Gerry? But then people have listened to this interview and did not question their guilt still. But seriously, if she was sedated, and let’s say she fell behind the couch and with out immediate help, died and remained there for about 1.5 hours.. Well, even if you claim you were home asleep, an autopsy would be done and if she had been sedated. That would show and you would now be held responsible. Lose your license etc. Again, same as I noted above. But so many still choose to not see this.   

And one last statement now added by Kate.

“and we’d hidden her so well that we’d decided we’d move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know, it’s just ridiculous”

Come on Kate. Statics alone on the number of “missing people” that are never found prove that this can be done. And people have moved bodies. If they panicked and hid the body someplace quick. Then later determined that they needed a better permanent spot… they could  have easily moved the body. Cause lets face it, even if there was a death in the rented apartment that had nothing to do with Madeleine, what are the odds that a death also occurred in the car you then rented. I mean, what are the odds that you rented that room that had someone die and a car that also someone died in?

And to be clear, those dogs were NEVER WRONG. The person above who is clearly on the “mccann payroll” stated that dogs are often wrong. That is just not true. Just because the body is no longer where the dogs hit. Or if the dogs hit on something that had transferred the scent, they are not wrong. They did hit on the scent of a dead human being in contact or transferred contact.  It has always been said they  hit on dead human scent but they can not distinguish who the scent belonged too. Just a dead human. So the dogs are not wrong. So that is just more of the typical BS people throw out with out the facts to confuse. Fact is the dogs did pick up the scent of a dead HUMAN. While they can not confirm it was a dead Madeleine. It was a dead human.  

So with that, what are the odds that a dead human was “behind the couch” in their vacation room and in the “trunk” of their vacation vehicle. I am sorry but you are talking about nearly impossible odds. Sure, it can happen. But what are those odds?

And those odds then coupled with innocent parents that had just had their child kidnapped? One in a zillion? I am just saying…

I know the Mccanns have spent more money suing people and well, paying their own bills than finding Madeleine. So I have to think that a lot of the supporters on these sites are also employed by them. They have made millions… So is is very possible. I have a full time job and have found time to write my thoughts.

Law Enforcement. .. hero's or criminals

Law Enforcement anymore are not the heros they should be.

Sure we still have those that stand true to this profession but more and more we see these very "heros" go to the dark side. Or is it just that criminals are smarter?

But if criminals are smarter, what does that saw about law enforcement?  Especially with the simple fact that most these criminals are drunks, on drugs or often just the random person next door.

Are average peopke outsmarting law enforcement? Drunks, addicts, etc outsmarting law enforcement?

Say it isnt so!

What will our world come to if this continues....

I am just the average person next door. I dont do drugs, and outside of the occasional drink..not a drunk.

Yet I can see past the bullshit and see the true guilt in so many cases that law enforcement just cant seem to bring to justice.

This is a sad predicament.

I mean lets look at a couple cases.

Hanna Anderson...

The supposed kidnap "victim". Law enforcement has closed this case out. Stand by the initial view that she is nothing more than a victim.

Now for those out there that keep stating she was just a "child" needs to watch a little more news. A teenager in Colorado raped and killed a little girl then cut her up and stored some of her body parts in his home. But I guess she's innocent because hes just a teenager?

Hannah posted a photo while in Hollywood (a trip she took with her kidnappper alone) and followed the photo up with #goodbye #hollywood #hello #river. Interesting that she she did next go to the  "river" with this kidnapper.

Her excuse for the 13 calls to him before the murders w
(Or texts) were just because as she stated "he didn't know the address or what - like, where I was. So I had to tell him the address and....." was such a HUGE LIE. That man was at all her games and practices and often drove her to school. Yet she says she needed 13 texts to communicate and address and LE finds that answer acceptable?

And lets not forget she states she was drugged and did did not wake until she reached Idaho despite the highway patrol cameras showing she was awake. Yet law enforcement I guess she no contradiction there? That she claims she was unconscious during the murders until arriving in Idaho is not anything that needs to be questioned. 

And then there is the statements that he told her if she tried to get help he would kill her.. then tells us at the river he tried to start a fire to "signal for help". WTF. And law enforcement does not find this disturbing?

Good job San Diego law enforcement.  A stupid teenage girl has outsmarted you. Your citizens should feel safe.

And then there is Scotland Yard. Now I can not figure this out, but they are sure stand fiercely behind Gerry and Kate McCann. But why?

What other case have they stood by like this? Especially a case that is well, not even anywhere close to being in their jurisdiction.  Another country even.

Why?

clearly there is a more here. I mean you have parents who chose to leave babies (2 and 3 year olds ARE BABIES) alone in their holiday room.

WtF? This is acceptable?

Even Nancy Grace who is always critical anytime a parent lacks judgment has failed to address this on her show.

What is really going on?

This is NEVER acceptable.  Its dangerous. Period. No one told them this was safe and they to this day feel no remorse or guilt over this horribleen choice.

Gerry Mccann even stated that being at that Tapas bar was like being in your garden (backyard for those of us in America) but this walk took 1.5 minutes. Bullshit Gerry. Its not like being in your backyard. Maybe the backyard of your neighbor 7 houses down. I walked 1.5 minutes from my front door and ended up down 7 houses.

There is a reason there are babysitters. CAUSE ITS NOT SAFE TO LEAVE YOUNG CHILDREN ALONE YOU SELFISH, NARRSISISIC, HORRIBLE EXCUSES FOR PARENTS.

But please Scotland Yard waste your tax payers money and protect these horrible people. You should be proud. You too have been out smarted.  Or worse. ?.. doOn you have your own evil skeletons and have been forced to keep up their charade. Or maybe you too are profiting????  I mean their sham "find Madeleine fund" has brought in millions.... millions that sure as hell are NOT being used to look for their "kidnapped" daughter. 

But please protect them. Thats a good use of tax payers money.  Who cares about homeless, starving childen.. Gerry and Kate need you to keep this sham alive.

You should be proud.

HEROS...

Then there is the super duper law enforcement in Texas.

Hailey Dunn disapeared yet so much evidence and no arrests...

Such as....

Moms had recently moved in her loser boyfriend who had recently threatened her life.

Poor Hailey tells her grandmother she is scared of his freak.

Mom and boyfriend are heaving drug users...

Mom and boyfriend lie about the boyfriend being at work all day the day she is last seen.

Both fail polygraphs.

Neither spend a moment searching and in fact a couple days after sge disappearsyou have a new years eve party.

Law enforcement finds child porn and beastility in your room.

And mommy speaks of Hailey in PAST TENSE?????

So despite the fact that child porn alone is a crime and that alome should have had them both prosecuted, they walk free. Then they find poor Haileys body along the path Shawns cell phone pinged the day je lied and stated he was at work....

But what, you domt have evidence to prosecute?

So again WTF law enforcement.

You can npt tell me these loser drug addict child porn lovers outsmarted you. So what, do we have another case of law enforcement that has their own demons so they can not pursue mommy dearest and her peice of shit boyfriend?

Just sad. That law enforcement is on the wrong side of the law.

You loose your hero badges. You are criminals who are too cowardly to be honest and instead hide behind the badge.

You childhood selves should be so proud.