I just read yet another support blog for the Gerry and Kate Mccann.
And it amazes me just how many people still believe them and blame the police despite what is so obvious to the rest of us with any common sense.
Why why why are people so naive and blind to the facts?
If the parents truly had no involvement, then these 2 have had just about the worst luck ever while still managing to stay clear of any legal responsibility. Even child endangerment for leaving babies alone. Which is illegal where I live and would and had this occurred here, they would have been arrested and CPS would have been involved .
But let’s break this down with just facts in the case and no theories or possible motives
So below I will include some facts and as the parents once stated they could provide for any evidence….. a “reasonable explanation” to each of them.
You decide if it was just a mistake, bad luck that just happened to happen during this horrible time, or something more.
And its several things. So maybe it was just all a coincidence. But please read and then decide.
1. The McCann’s stated that it was “normal” for their children to sleep through the night.
a. It’s totally normal for all 3 kids in the same family to all normally sleep through the night
i. May 1st when the neighbor, Pamela Fern stated to police that she heard Madeleine crying from the McCann apartment beginning at approximately 10:30 pm until 11:45pmwas just lying. Even being sure it was Madeline and not the twins since the child was shouting “DADDY, DADDY” was just lying
ii. Madeleine asking them the next day why they didn’t come when they cried was just a random thought. She must have woke briefly and fallen right back to sleep
iii. Or, maybe……this was the one time she woke up… and was the only time they did not check every 15 minutes and was just an awful coincidence
2. There was a chart at the home of the Mccann family offering stars for Madeleine for “staying in her bed” (there are photos confirming this chart)
a. I am sure this was only during nap time and had nothing to do with her night time behavior since she normally slept through the night
3. It is totally safe to leave 2 and 3 year old children alone
a. Sure, its only illegal in some locations because the laws are stupid
b. 2 and 3 year olds can fend for themselves, especially if its night time
c. What could POSSIBLY go wrong in 30 minutes, or an hour or longer
i. No child has ever died from an accident in the home or in their vacation unit
ii. No child has ever had an accident while being checked every hour that caused great harm or death
4. The Mccann’s stated in initial police statements that they unlocked the door each time they entered to do their checks and later changed this to using the unlocked side doors because they forgot
a. This would be something you would totally forget
b. And…..leaving a door unlocked that was near a PUBLIC street is totally safe
c. The police lied
5. The restaurant was not any different than being in your garden (backyard to us in America) as Gerry stated
a. Sure it is Gerry. It takes me over a 1.5 mins to walk to my back yard from my back door
b. And like in my backyard, you can hear your kids if they need you or wake up
6. They checked on the kids every 15 minutes
a. Pamela Ferm who claimed the kids cried for over an hour lied
7. Checking on kids every 15 minutes from the restaurant which was about a 1.5 minute walk each way would make for a fun and relaxing night out with friends and a much better option that hiring the onsite babysitter
a. Sure, the chaos of the constant up and down of 9 people going back and forth every 15 minutes would not be distracting and this would be way easier
8. The police were against the Mccann’s and did not try to help find the child and sought only to frame the Mccann’s
a. I guess extensive searches by land, air and water being done was just for “show”
b. The station set up in front of the apartment to take calls/tips 24/7 was just for “show”
c. The thousands of people that helped search streets, homes, paths, trash etc was just for “show”
d. The extensive search of the homes and apartments nearby just for “show”
e. The extensive police files was just for “show”
i. Yah, they did nothing to find this kidnapped child
f. And… The lack of a single sign of an abduction was only because the police covered it all up and no one saw this and the Mccann’s have failed to publicly site any of these “cover ups” I guess out of fear
9. There REALLY were signs of an abduction
a. The window in the kids room was open when Kate first discovered Madeleine missing
i. She then closed it all up
ii. Or….Someone must have come in and closed this to help with the cover up and framing of the parents
b. The shutters were broken as Gerry stated
i. Someone must have come in and fixed them to help with the cover up and framing of the parents
c. Gerry and Kates family spokesperson later addressing that the window was closed and the shutters were not broken has no relevance
i. The spokesperson lied and did not speak on their behalf as he had his own agenda
ii. They must have been thinking of another night the window was open and the shutters were broken
iii. Or… they were forced to stand by this false statement out of fear yet even years later, in their own country still fear for their safety
1. The book they wrote does not prove they are not fearful and they still have refused to call the police out for tampering with evidence of the break in because of well, fear?
10. After Kate discovered Madeleine was abducted and as she stated, was sure of, she then left the twins in the room ALONE to make the trip back to the table to notify the rest
a. But she was just in shock and not thinking clearly or using an common sense OR natural motherly instincts to protect her remaining children from abduction as well and bring them with her or just scream for help
11. The twins not waking up or even moving (several witnesses made this same observation). despite Kate’s screams (Neighbor Pamela Fern heard these screams and made statements to the police as such), frantic searches by the family/friends and the police, and moving to another room the twins did not wake or and they did not force them to wake up to simply make sure they were ok or see if they could possibly relay anything that had occurred
a. This is normal, kids sleep through a traumatic events that involved screaming with many people trampling through a room is normal, right
b. And you would rather have the kids sleep through all this and not be concerned about them not waking or want to ensure they were ok and not hurt
12. A cadaver dog picked up a scent on Kate’s clothing, Madeleine’s shirt and favorite toy (a toy which was on the bed but the scent was not picked up on the bed itself indicating the toy was placed here later), the closest and behind the couch
a. For Kate’s clothes and Madeleine’s shirt and favorite toy to have the scent, that means that even as a part time GP, per her claims the week prior to the vacation, she would have to have come into DIRECT physical contact with at least one dead body for an extended period of time (needed in order to not only absorb the odor on to her clothes despite being washed , but to transfer to her childs clothes and toy)
i. She then had her work clothes packed with ONLY Madeleine’s shirt and favorite cuddle toy allowing them to both absorb the odor
ii. Or Eddie, the cadaver dog with years of experience and 100% accuracy was wrong.
b. For the apartment, I guess Eddie, the cadaver dog with years of experience and 100% accuracy was wrong?
i. Or… the hotel lied and there WAS a death in that apartment previously. A death where the dead body was moved from the closet to the floor behind the couch or vice versa
ii. Or…..there was another murder in this very same room and the body was located behind the couch and the closet at some point
13. A Cadaver dog picked up the scent of a body on the key and the truck of the car the Mccann’s rented 20+ days after Madeleine disappeared.
a. So again, I guess Eddie, the cadaver dog with years of experience and 100% accuracy was wrong AGAIN?
i. Or, the rental car company lied and there had been a death in that car and he person was kept in the trunk with the keys in their pocket
ii. Or…..Someone was murdered and then kept in the trunk with the keys in their pocket
14. A Blood dog picked up the scent of bodily fluids (likely blood) behind the couch in the same location as the cadaver dog.
a. This dog Keela with years of experience and 100% accuracy was WRONG too
b. This is just a totally random coincidence
c. Or there was a prior death behind the couch and again, the hotel lied
d. Or there was a prior murder in this apartment and this is where it occurred
15. DNA was an 88% match to Madeline
a. The DNA was not a 100% to Madeleine
i. The DNA sample was very limited which limits the testing but…. And, if this DNA had it not been Madeleine’s would have resulted in a 0% match. But I guess the lab made a mistake.
16. Despite later comments by the parents that they themselves wondered if the twins may have been drugged, they choose not to try to wake them to ensure they were safe and unharmed and take them to the hospital for testing to make sure they were not sedated at all during this time since a kidnapper had taken their other child and could have caused them harm
a. This was only something they stated after it become public knowledge that the police suspected sedation because at the time, it just slipped their minds
b. And why, if you had a child abducted and the remaining 2 did not wake up or move who would have any reason to be concerned for their safety. Just take them to another room and let them sleep. They must be fine if they are breathing and we do know Kate checked several times (the police witnessed Kate placing her hand over their nose mouth area several times)
17. But they did have the Twins tested for drugs 4 months later
a. Even though the labs standard testing procedure of hair for drugs only covers 3 months back, it still proves they were not sedated 4 months later
b. Or… maybe they had the tests done outside of laboratory standards. But this could only be done for Amalie since the length of Sean’s hair at the time (his hair was very short and based on how quickly hair typically grows would have been grown and cut) would just about guarantee that no hair remained from the time of the kidnapping
i. And the fact Gerry and Kate never choose to get the testing done immediately was normal as why would anyone be concerned
ii. Gerry and Kate also choosing not to provide any proof that tests were done further back on the hair samples or even done at all means nothing. Because well who needs proof, they have only had accusations made that they sedated the children and no charges were filed
iii. And…. don’t care what anyone says or thinks as their only care is finding care Madeleine
c. The other fact that they are doctors and likely are familiar with all the labs and the technicians in the area (they claim the tests were done in their home down) as well how testing is done has no relevance at all and this direct connection and special knowledge does not help them if they were trying to hide the fact that they sedated the kids as they would for sure be held to the same standards as the guy next door
d. And…This testing would have been extensive because it’s a criminal investigation
i. But no, the case was closed. This was not a test done by police as part of the investigation but rather Gerry and Kate’s own selected personal test but still proves they didn’t sedate their kids
18. Gerry and Kate did not see any point ever in searching for their “kidnapped” daughter
a. Totally normal and expected. I know if my child was kidnapped, I would just wait for someone else to find him. I would even play tennis and go jogging in the days that followed. All what parents of missing kids just go about their lives
i. The parents of missing kids 10-20-30 years later that are still haunted and devastated by the loss just need to get a grip and move on, it’s only a kid, just make another one
19. Despite allegations and even being listed as suspects, Gerry and Kate Mccann refused to take a polygraph test
a. Innocent parents always refuse to take a polygraph because so many have been wrongly convicted even though they are not admissible in court
20. The McCann’s have a private fund to find Madeline and despite the allegations the fund has been mainly used to pay their personal and legal bills and only limited amounts have gone to actually find their daughter, they have done nothing to prove this wrong
a. Again who cares about accusations? They are only focused on finding their child
21. The McCann’s have spent more time, money and effort in fighting against Pat Brown and the main detective who have written books alleging their guilt over searching for their daughter
a. Allegations in the books against these innocent parents is more important as it will affect the search for Madeleine
i. The allegations are not new and those buying the books are likely those that already questioned their guilt and still despite Pat Browns book having been out for quite some time, media attention for a “abducted” Madeleine is still high
1. This is not true and it greatly affected the search and they can prove it
22. And last…. But not least… Statement Analysis has noted high levels of deception by both parents around the involvement in Madeline missing
a. Statement analysis is wrong and has never been proven right. ……
No comments:
Post a Comment