Saturday, December 7, 2013

Gerry and Kate Mccann need to be held accountable!

Why do people really still buy in to the bullshit?
Are people still that naïve, stupid?
Apparently they do. Look at all the supporters in the comments supporting them. 

Do some searching. Read other articles, blogs. There are even entire blogs that support them. Blogs that find a reason to excuse every lie, discrepancy, bad decision. Why?
I am so fed up with the lies and the blame being pushed on others.

The only true blame lies with mom and dad. Mom and dad left their babies ALONE.  Even if the child was simply abducted (which I think is a flat out lie) had they been there, I do not think it would have happened.
And for the LOVE OF PETE….There is a reason 2 and 3 year olds are not to be left alone. It is DANGEROUS.

FACT FACT FACT. DANGEROUS.
Nothing else is more important.
I am a mom. I know what my son could do at the age of 2. At the age of 3. I would never have left him alone. Even at the age of 6 I do NOT leave him alone. In fact, where I live it is ILLEGAL to leave a child under the age of 13 alone. And had the Mccanns done that here, they would have been arrested and charged with child endangerment. FACT again. Yet in this case, they are almost hero’s that suffered something that they had no part in.

Really? Leaving your children alone is your fault. No one else is to blame.
I  have a huge family. I babysat most of my teen years. I know what kids that age can and do AND get into. In minutes. So to put them alone for hours?
And we all know that at least 2 days prior to Madeline missing, they were not checking as they claimed. We all know that the woman upstairs heard a child crying for OVER AN HOUR. This is a fact! The parents even tried to minimize this by saying Madeleine asked them where they were. But hey  mom and dad, even if she quickly dropped it… its still an issues. Not only did she NOT sleep through the night, even with this, you continued to leave them alone.
So the simple fact here is that mom and dad left babies alone. ALONE.  
And we know that the kids did wake up. So why the hell did you continue to do so?
One reason. They were Selfish!
PERIOD.
There is no excuse.
The steps from the room to the Tapas bar was traced by several people…
It is a 1.5 minute walk. FACT FACT FACT. Can I say this again, that this is a fact.
This is not like being in your backyard (garden) as Gerry claims. I have sat in my back yard and yah know what, my kid has needed me and he was able to just come to the backyard and get me. Or if he cried, I can hear him. FACT.
A 1.5 minute walk is more like being in the backyard (garden) 6 houses down the road. You can not hear your child cry. You can not tend to them if there is an accident. It is dangerous.
So why why why do all of you stupid people still think they are innocent??????
Stop being stupid and wake the heck up!
This was not a bad decision. This was a life altering horrible selfish decision. Gerry and Kate are to blame and have not for one second ever even owned this blame. They excuse this behavior as totally acceptable. When it’s not!
They choose to hang out, eat and drink too far to hear the kids…..despite the dangers that are there for young children.
So right off the bat, at the least there should have been charges for that. Yet none were made.
We instead have the blame put on the police. They did nothing.
Well, anyone that wishes to make this claim needs to do some research. That is a lie. Nothing more. There was more done to find this child than just about any case in the world. Searches were immediate. They were done on land, in water and in the air. How often do you see missing kids searched for by boat and air? You don’t. But I guess in this case, it happening still makes people say they did nothing really to help. Sounds to me more like mom and dad trying desperately to put the focus on anyone but them and their own shit decisions.
Then if that was not enough… the lies and refusal to help this case continued.

Both stated that the shutters were broken, jimmied, open.  This is a fact. It was said by both.
Gerry even stated that he went out side and tested the shutters and they COULD be opened from outside.
Why would anyone need to flat out lie about those shutters? If your child was kidnapped and you are innocent. Why would you lie about those shutters?

But they both lied about them.
Because the fact here is that the shutters were not open. They were not broken. And they CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE.This was tested and proven to be a fact. THEY CAN NOT BE OPENED FROM OUTSIDE with out being broken. They were not broken.
Also, mom and dad also stated themselves that the shutters had been closed the entire trip until this night. So if this is true, why then were moms fingerprints on the shutters? If they never opened them, Kates fingerprints would not be there. But they were. Again, I am talking about facts. 
Also, Gerry stated that when he got back to the room with Kate after she came running to tell him Madeleine was taken, that the shutters were OPEN. So, now we have mom leaving the twins ALONE AGAIN in the same room where the claim Madeline was “kidnapped” but she even left those shutters OPEN. REALLY?
So ask yourself why would anyone lie about this?  
There is only one logical reason. They needed to lie. They needed to support their kidnapping story.
Why? Well, if there was an accidental death, and like I believe. the children had been sedated they must lie. An autopsy would show the sedation.
·         They would be charged for her death  
·         They would lose their licenses to practice medicine
·         And would likely lose their other children.
Lots of motive here to lie. Yet still people ignore these facts in the case.
Why would the police need to lie?
And I watched one of their interviews where Gerry and Kate made the following comments. Those are pasted below directly from the transcripts.
 I am now going to answer each of the questions or points Gerry claims were basically nonsense. This is not some crazy theory. It’s not like police are claiming she was abducted by aliens. The theory police have matches the evidence.
Gerry: I mean the ludicrous thing is erm what, I suppose what’s been purported from Portugal is that Madeleine died in the apartment by an accident and we hid her body. Well when did she have the accident and died, because, the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner so ...if she died then, how could we of disposed – hidden her body. You know, when there’s an immediate [inaudible but sounds like he was about to say ‘search’] it’s just nonsense. And if she died when we were in the apartment or fell and di...why would we ...why would we cover that up?
Kate: and we’d hidden her so well that we’d decided we’d move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know, it’s just ridiculous
So let’s lets break their statements down.
1.       “Well when did she have the accident and died, because, the only time she was left unattended was when we were at dinner”
Gerry. You just answered your question. You were a 1.5 minute walk away. Kids can not fend for themselves. So if she was hurt, no one was there to help her. So this was exactly when she could have died. But please claim innocence since you were not technically there. Its not much different than leaving a child alone at the pool “for just a minute”. Its not safe and should not be done.  
Next statement.
“if she died then, how could we of disposed – hidden her body”
Gerry. Again, people kill and dispose of bodies EVERY SINGLE DAY. This is not impossible. This is not like the claims are you snapped your fingers and she was gone. There were many places to quickly leave the body.  I mean Gerry even lied about how long he talked to the friend he ran into. Stated it was about 15 minutes when the friend claimed it was only about 3. The fact that this time was greatly exaggerated at the EXACT time the “kidnapper” would have been running off with Madeleine is just too much of a coincidence. This gives Gerry several minutes to hide the body somewhere and return to the Tapas bar to wait for mommy to break the news.
Next statement.
“And if she died when we were in the apartment or fell and di...why would we ...why would we cover that up?’
Really Gerry? But then people have listened to this interview and did not question their guilt still. But seriously, if she was sedated, and let’s say she fell behind the couch and with out immediate help, died and remained there for about 1.5 hours.. Well, even if you claim you were home asleep, an autopsy would be done and if she had been sedated. That would show and you would now be held responsible. Lose your license etc. Again, same as I noted above. But so many still choose to not see this.   
And one last statement now added by Kate.
and we’d hidden her so well that we’d decided we’d move her in the car which we hired weeks later and you know, it’s just ridiculous”
Come on Kate. Statics alone on the number of “missing people” that are never found prove that this can be done. And people have moved bodies. If they panicked and hid the body someplace quick. Then later determined that they needed a better permanent spot… they could  have easily moved the body. Cause lets face it, even if there was a death in the rented apartment that had nothing to do with Madeleine, what are the odds that a death also occurred in the car you then rented. I mean, what are the odds that you rented that room that had someone die and a car that also someone died in?
And to be clear, those dogs were NEVER WRONG. The person above who is clearly on the “mccann payroll” stated that dogs are often wrong. That is just not true. Just because the body is no longer where the dogs hit. Or if the dogs hit on something that had transferred the scent, they are not wrong. They did hit on the scent of a dead human being in contact or transferred contact.  It has always been said they  hit on dead human scent but they can not distinguish who the scent belonged too. Just a dead human. So the dogs are not wrong. So that is just more of the typical BS people throw out with out the facts to confuse. Fact is the dogs did pick up the scent of a dead HUMAN. While they can not confirm it was a dead Madeleine. It was a dead human.  
So with that, what are the odds that a dead human was “behind the couch” in their vacation room and in the “trunk” of their vacation vehicle. I am sorry but you are talking about nearly impossible odds. Sure, it can happen. But what are those odds?
And those odds then coupled with innocent parents that had just had their child kidnapped? One in a zillion? I am just saying…
I know the Mccanns have spent more money suing people and well, paying their own bills than finding Madeleine. So I have to think that a lot of the supporters on these sites are also employed by them. They have made millions… So is is very possible. I have a full time job and have found time to write my thoughts.

No comments:

Post a Comment